Faculty Senate-approved Recommendations: Criteria and Evaluation for Promotion and TenureApproved by the Faculty Senate April 28, 1997Note:Faculty members should consult departmental and college criteria for promotion and tenure.
I. General Expectations of Faculty at The University
of Arizona Whatever the field of learning, the pervasive institutional values are: an interest in perpetuating and disseminating knowledge through teaching programs at all levels; a respect for research, scholarship and artistic endeavor; a collegial approach to personal interactions; and a concern for the application of new knowledge and insights that will improve the human condition. To achieve success, the recruitment and retention of outstanding faculty must be given the highest priority. To ensure that the faculty is and continues to be of very high quality, effective systems for recruitment and retention, for reward and recognition (including promotion and tenure), and for faculty development must be maintained, giving proper consideration to contributions in teaching, research, and professional and public service. To maintain an outstanding faculty, the University must insist on rigorous standards for promotion and tenure. The obvious ideal is a high level of professionalism in the categories of scholarship as reflected in teaching, research or creative activity, and service. A combination of excellence in teaching and strong research or creative activity, or strong teaching and excellence in research or creative activity, both with demonstrated service to the institution, community, and profession, will normally warrant promotion and/or tenure. Teaching: The instructional function of the University requires faculty members who can effectively communicate the content of the current body of knowledge and the latest research results in the classroom, in other learning environments, with individual student contact and through professional modes of publication (in its widest sense). Excellence in teaching includes, but is not limited to:
Research/Creative Activity: The research function of the University requires faculty members to be actively engaged in the expansion of intellectual and creative frontiers, in the application of new knowledge, and in the integration of knowledge from various disciplines. Excellence in research includes, but is not limited to:
Service/Outreach: Service includes: service on departmental (or unit), college, and University committees; service to professional associations and on public committees where faculty disciplinary knowledge is required. Service becomes an increasingly important part of a faculty member's activities as he or she advances through the professorial ranks. Outreach is a form of scholarship that cuts across teaching and research/creative activity. It involves delivering, applying, and preserving knowledge for the direct benefit of external audiences in ways that are consistent with University and unit missions. The application of one's expertise to issues in the community is encouraged and often generates research ideas and contributions. Service/outreach activities include, but are not limited to:
The primary characteristic that The University of Arizona demands in its faculty is high quality, whatever their category and rank. Without it, we cannot be a leading institution. Tenure and promotion depend on past accomplishments and on the promise of continued excellence. Every member of every committee involved in promotion and tenure decisions has the responsibility to guarantee that our quality is preserved and enhanced.
II. University Criteria for Promotion and Tenure
This document frames general criteria, applied by the University Promotion and Tenure Committee and employed by the Provost and the President in making final decisions. University guidelines serve as an effective reference for the development and revision of individual academic unit guidelines, which must reflect discipline-specific characteristics, defined activities, expectations, standards and criteria, and evaluative measures. All unit guidelines for promotion and tenure should uphold the general University criteria and standards. Each unit, division, school and college, in turn, should have its own approved criteria for promotion and tenure that are appropriate to its faculty. In addition to unit-specific criteria for promotion and tenure, it is essential that a faculty member's workload responsibilities are clearly defined at the time of hire and are reviewed annually. Faculty members and unit heads are required to outline the relative importance assigned to teaching, research and service/outreach activities in relationship to the unit's mission and strategic plan. The workload assignment provides the context for evaluating a candidate's success in meeting performance expectations for promotion and/or tenure.
A. General Criteria
B. Promotion to Associate Professor with Tenure
An important measure of quality is the evaluation by independent internal and external reviewers. Faculty members must show effectiveness within the classroom and other learning environments in organizing and presenting material and in stimulating intellectual response. Evidence on teaching effectiveness must come from: student evaluation; a peer review of the teaching portfolio and of the quality of feedback to students on their work; recognition of advising responsibilities; and participation in faculty development activities. Other evidence may include, but is not limited to: grants for teaching innovations; teaching awards; selection to teach in prestigious programs; achievements by students; and in-class peer evaluation. Evidence of efforts to improve teaching effectiveness (e.g., the appropriate use of technology) should be provided. Availability to students during office hours is an expectation. 2. Research/Creative Activity
An important measure of quality is the evaluation by independent internal and external reviewers. The achievement of a candidate's stature may be measured in the quality of the specific media of publication or presentation. Other measures may include, but are not limited to: citation rates; receiving grants, contracts, awards and fellowships in support of the candidate's work; and the attraction of advanced students to the candidate's tutelage. 3. Service/Outreach
An important measure of quality is the evaluation by independent internal and external reviewers. Evidence of the above should be provided and should reveal that assistant professors worthy of promotion to associate professor with tenure have begun to develop a habit of service, that their judgments are professionally respected and valued, and that they have demonstrated the ability and an interest in finding linkages between their discipline and public interests, needs and opportunities.
C. Promotion to Professor
1. Teaching
An important measure of quality is the evaluation by independent internal and external reviewers. Evidence of teaching effectiveness should continue to come from student evaluations, peer evaluations, advising, achievements by students, teaching grants and awards, successful innovation, selection to teach in prestigious programs here and elsewhere, and participation in faculty development activities. Faculty are expected to continually improve their teaching by staying current with the latest developments in the discipline and with pedagogical techniques. 2. Research/Creative Activity
An important measure of quality is the evaluation by independent internal and external reviewers. This level of achievement is manifested in signs such as the quality and quantity of work presented in reviewed media or means of presentation; the opinions of peers from other institutions; citations of the candidate's work in his/her discipline; evidence that the candidate's work or findings have been incorporated into the field; the attainment and/or renewal of major awards, grants, and fellowships; presentations to scholarly or artistic communities beyond the southwest region; the reprinting and/or translation of a candidate's work abroad; the invitation to serve on editorial boards or other boards of judgment, to review manuscripts for leading journals and presses, to review grant applications for national funding agencies, and to evaluate candidates from other institutions for promotion and/or tenure.
3. Service/Outreach
Table I. Examples of Faculty Activities That May Be Considered for Evaluation
Annual Review and Post-tenure Review Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs UAINFO
September 2004 |